Current:Home > NewsEx-Google workers sue company, saying it betrayed 'Don't Be Evil' motto -TrueNorth Finance Path
Ex-Google workers sue company, saying it betrayed 'Don't Be Evil' motto
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:56:45
Three former Google employees have sued the company, alleging that Google's motto "Don't be evil" amounts to a contractual obligation that the tech giant has violated.
At the time the company hired the three software engineers, Rebecca Rivers, Sophie Waldman and Paul Duke, they signed conduct rules that included a "Don't be evil" provision, according to the suit.
The trio say they thought they were behaving in accordance with that principle when they organized Google employees against controversial projects, such as work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection during the Trump administration. The workers circulated a petition calling on Google to publicly commit to not working with CBP.
Google fired the three workers, along with a fourth, Laurence Berland, in November 2019 for "clear and repeated violations" of the company's data security policies. The four deny they accessed and leaked confidential documents as part of their activism.
In the lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Monday, Rivers, Waldman and Duke argue that they should receive monetary damages because the company allegedly retaliated against them when they tried to draw attention to Google's "doing evil," the suit states.
It may be an uphill battle to convince a jury of exactly what constitutes "evil." But the plaintiffs' lawyer, Laurie Burgess, said it is not beyond what courts regularly must decide.
"There are all sorts of contract terms that a jury is required to interpret: 'don't be evil' is not so 'out there' as to be unenforceable," she said. "Since Google's contract tells employees that they can be fired for failing to abide by the motto, 'don't be evil,' it must have meaning."
Google did not immediately return a request for comment.
The "Don't be evil" principle is often attributed to Paul Buchheit and Amit Patel, two early Google employees. The phrase was written on every white board at the company during its early years, according to the 2008 book Planet Google by Randall Stross.
"It became the one Google value that the public knew well, even though it was formally expressed at Google less pithily as, 'You can make money without doing evil,'" Stross wrote.
In 2018, there were reports suggesting that Google had removed "Don't be evil" from its code of conduct. But an updated version, dated September 2020, shows the phrase remains. It is unclear when the motto was re-introduced.
The suit comes amid a surge in labor activism at tech companies like Apple Facebook, Netflix and Amazon. A group of workers at Google, which is owned by Alphabet, formed a minority union earlier this year around issues including sexual harassment, its work with the Pentagon and the treatment of its sizable contract workforce.
The National Labor Relations Board is investigating the firing of the three Google workers who sued on Monday. The Board wrote in May that Google "arguably violated" federal labor law by "unlawfully discharging" Rivers, Duke and Waldman. The NLRB matter is awaiting a final resolution.
Meanwhile, the software engineers say Google should be punished for not living up to its own moral code.
"Google realized that 'don't be evil' was both costing it money and driving workers to organize," the ex-Googlers said in a statement on Monday. "Rather than admit that their stance had changed and lose the accompanying benefits to the company image, Google fired employees who were living the motto."
Editor's note: Google is among NPR's financial supporters.
veryGood! (48214)
Related
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Illinois Clean Energy Law’s Failed Promises: No New Jobs or Job-Training
- After Criticism, Gas Industry Official Withdraws as Candidate for Maryland’s Public Service Commission
- Trader Joe's has issued recalls for 2 types of cookies that could contain rocks
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Flash Deal: 52% Off a Revlon Heated Brush That Dries and Styles at the Time Same
- In the Race to Develop the Best Solar Power Materials, What If the Key Ingredient Is Effort?
- The ‘Plant Daddy of Dallas’ Is Paving the Way for Clean, Profitable Urban Agriculture
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Summer School 2: Competition and the cheaper sneaker
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Ryan Reynolds, John Legend and More Stars React to 2023 Emmy Nominations
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2023: Everything Ambassadors Need to Know to Score the Best Deals
- NOAA Climate Scientists Cruise Washington and Baltimore for Hotspots—of Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollutants
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Why the Feared Wave of Solar Panel Waste May Be Smaller and Arrive Later Than We Expected
- Wes Moore Names Two Members to Maryland Public Service Commission
- Raven-Symoné Reveals How She Really Feels About the Ozempic Craze
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Affirmative action for rich kids: It's more than just legacy admissions
Amazon Prime Day 2023 Beauty Steal: Get 10 Breakout-Clearing Sheet Masks for $13
New York’s New Mayor Has Assembled a Seasoned Climate Team. Now, the Real Work Begins
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
Why Author Colleen Hoover Calls It Ends With Us' Popularity Bittersweet
Lift Your Face in Just 5 Minutes and Save $80 on the NuFace Toning Device on Prime Day 2023
Why the Feared Wave of Solar Panel Waste May Be Smaller and Arrive Later Than We Expected